The ECEC Financial Benchmarks You Need to Be Aware Of 

“A wise person should have money in their head, but not in their heart.” — Jonathan Swift 

The early childhood education and care (ECEC) sector in Australia benefits from strong demand and government-backed stability. The Child Care Subsidy (CCS) plays a central role by making services affordable for families and ensuring predictable revenue for providers. This combination of steady enrolments and essential service delivery makes ECEC an attractive and resilient industry. 

Staffing is the most significant cost, typically 65 to 75 percent of gross revenue. Effective occupancy management, efficient rostering and strategic owner involvement can enhance sustainability. Educator-to-child ratios and qualification requirements under the National Quality Framework also shape workforce planning and long-term costs. 

Financial strength depends on meeting occupancy targets, implementing effective fee structures and maintaining careful budgeting for compliance, resources and marketing. ECEC services should aim for 85 to 95 percent occupancy, balance competitive pricing with value and allocate funds for professional development and promotion. Regularly reviewing these benchmarks helps providers maintain both quality care and financial viability. 

Woman sitting at a laptop, perhaps reviewing the ECEC financial benchmarks for her service

Maybe you’re new to the early childhood education and care (ECEC) sector. Or perhaps you’re considering how to develop your existing ECEC service in a financially prudent manner. Either way, some critical ECEC financial benchmarks should always be front of mind. This is a quick summary to help you focus on the most important ones. 

Staff costs are one of your most significant ECEC financial benchmarks 

Staff costs typically represent 65–75% of gross revenue in well-managed ECEC services. This is your largest expense category, so managing it effectively is crucial for sustainability. To optimise this percentage: 

  • Maximise occupancy—Higher occupancy rates spread fixed staffing costs across more children, improving your cost efficiency.
  • Strategic owner involvement—Owner-operators who work directly in the service can reduce external staffing costs while maintaining quality.
  • Efficient rostering—Use data-driven approaches to match staffing levels with demand patterns throughout the week. 

Educator-to-child ratios 

Understanding mandatory ratios is essential for workforce planning and cost management: 

  • Ages 0–2: 1 educator for every 4 children
  • Ages 2–3: 1 educator for every 5 children 
  • Ages 3+: 1 educator for every 10 children (15 children in some jurisdictions for preschool programs) 

Note: Some states have specific variations to these ratios, so always check your local regulations. 

Staffing requirements and qualifications 

Services must maintain specific qualification mixes as outlined in the National Quality Framework: 

  • Educational Leader—Required for all services, responsible for curriculum development and educational programs
  • Qualified educators—Mix of Early Childhood Educators (Bachelor’s degree), Diploma-qualified educators, and Certificate III staff
  • Relief staff—Maintain a pool of 2–3 casual educators to cover sick leave, annual leave and unexpected absences 

Professional development costs should be budgeted at approximately 1–2% of staff costs annually. 

Occupancy targets 

Break-even occupancy varies by service size and cost structure but typically ranges from 85–95%. Key occupancy strategies include: 

  • Consistent attendance—Encourage a minimum of 2–3 days per week per child to improve revenue predictability
  • Waitlist management—Maintain active waitlists for all age groups to fill vacancies quickly
  • Retention focus—It’s more cost-effective to retain existing families than constantly recruit new ones 

Fee structure considerations 

Important: Childcare fees are GST-free, but this doesn’t apply to additional services like excursions or extra meals. 

Current market rates vary significantly by location, with metropolitan areas typically commanding higher fees. Rather than providing specific dollar amounts (which become outdated quickly), consider these pricing factors: 

  • Local market research—Survey competitor pricing in your specific area
  • Government funding—Factor in Child Care Subsidy (CCS) and any state-based funding
  • Value proposition—Premium services can command higher fees if the value is clearly demonstrated
  • Cost plus margin—Ensure fees cover all operational costs plus a reasonable profit margin 

Additional ECEC financial benchmarks to consider

Regulatory compliance costs—Budget for quality assurance, professional development and regulatory reporting requirements. 

Technology and resources—Modern ECEC services require investment in management software, educational resources and safety equipment. 

Marketing and enrolment—Allocate 2–3% of revenue for marketing activities to maintain enrolment levels. 

Remember this when it comes to ECEC financial benchmarks 

Successful ECEC financial management requires balancing regulatory compliance, quality care delivery and business sustainability. Regularly reviewing these benchmarks against your actual performance will help identify areas for improvement and ensure long-term viability. 

For the most current regulatory requirements and financial guidelines specific to your state or territory, consult your local regulatory authority and consider engaging with an ECEC-specialist accountant. 

  • First published: 05 September 2025

    Written by: Dean Comeau